Notice of Defects

-


By: Tom Cullen

Share

Madison, WI - Madison, WI - The Inspection Contingency in the WB-11 Residential Offer to Purchase (lines 298-315) is a provision that tends to create many issues and questions for the real estate practitioner. One such issue concerns the buyer's right to provide notice of a defect, which has been identified by the home inspector and was previously disclosed by the seller.

As a general rule, a buyer who has actual knowledge or written notice of a defect before writing the offer cannot list the defect when giving a notice of defects under the inspection contingency. There is, however, an exception to this rule. If the seller does not make a full and complete disclosure of the "nature and extent" of the defect, then the buyer may still list the defect in the inspection contingency notice.

Lines 311-315 of the offer state, "[F]or purposes of this [inspection] contingency, a defect is defined as a structural, mechanical or other condition that would have a significant adverse effect on the value of the property; that would significantly impair the health or safety of future occupants of the property; or that if not repaired, removed or replaced would significantly shorten or have a significant adverse effect on the normal life of the property. Defects do not include structural, mechanical or other conditions the nature and extent of which buyer had actual knowledge or written notice before signing this offer" (italics added).

An Example of the Issue
Mr. Seller fills out the Real Estate Condition Report (RECR) for the sale of his single-family home. On question C-10, relative to basement defects, the seller checks "yes" and explains that there are some cracks in the basement walls.

Ms. Buyer receives the RECR before submitting her offer to purchase. During the home inspection, the home inspector concludes that three of the basement walls are cracked to such a degree that they are in need of immediate repair. The inspector recommends that a basement expert be retained and warns that the needed repairs might exceed $10,000.
After a failed attempt to amend the offer, Ms. Buyer delivers a notice of defects concerning the basement. Mr. Seller objects, contending that the basement cracks cannot be listed on the notice of defects because they were disclosed on the RECR.

Ms. Buyer replies that Mr. Seller did not sufficiently disclose the nature and extent of the basement cracks, so she is entitled to give notice.

As a result of this controversy, the transaction does not close. Such a situation can be avoided if the seller gives a detailed explanation of the "nature and extent" of the defect, or if the buyer drafts the offer to provide for a closer examination of the disclosed defect.

Detailed Seller Disclosures
Whether a seller fully disclosed the nature and extent of a defect is ultimately a question of fact for a court of law. In order to avoid litigating this issue, a prudent listing agent should make sure that a seller understands that a buyer cannot list a defect under the inspection contingency if that defect is fully disclosed. Conversely, a defect that is described in only general terms, or is understated as to its depth or degree, provides an "out" for the buyer because the inspection contingency is still in play.

The seller's disclosure on the RECR should have enough detail so that a home inspector cannot add any significant information about the nature and extent of a defect. For example, Mr. Seller's RECR could have stated, "the north, east and south walls have numerous and significant cracks up to one inch in diameter. As a result, the walls have noteworthy shifting and bowing. Seller recommends that buyer retain a basement/foundation expert concerning any needed repairs." If Mr. Seller does not feel he has adequate knowledge or expertise or is simply not comfortable making such a statement, he can retain an expert to complete the RECR on his behalf.

Buyer-Specific Inspection Provisions
In many transactions where a defect is fully disclosed by a seller, the buyer may still want the opportunity to investigate the matter, get estimates for the work and then decide if he or she wants to purchase the property. In such a situation, the buyer may want to alter the offer to allow him or herself to give notice under the inspection contingency despite the seller's full disclosure. The offer may be altered by adding language allowing a "fully disclosed defect" to be the subject of a notice of defects if the cost for the replacement exceeds a given amount. Other ways to alter the offer call for including a separate contingency so that an appropriate expert can evaluate the item of concern, or striking the sentence that excludes fully disclosed defects (lines 314-315).

 

Published: 11/3/2004

 


 

November 2004 Issue